Re: [PATCH V3 0/5] Allow user to request memory to be locked on page fault

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 8 Jul 2015 09:23:02 -0400 Eric B Munson <emunson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > I don't know whether these syscalls should be documented via new
> > manpages, or if we should instead add them to the existing
> > mlock/munlock/mlockall manpages.  Michael, could you please advise?
> > 
> 
> Thanks for adding the series.  I owe you several updates (getting the
> new syscall right for all architectures and a set of tests for the new
> syscalls).  Would you prefer a new pair of patches or I update this set?

It doesn't matter much.  I guess a full update will be more convenient
at your end.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]