Thank you Josh! CC mn10300 maintainers for possible fix in arch/mn10300/ code. -fengguang On Sat, Jul 04, 2015 at 01:48:38PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > On Sat, Jul 04, 2015 at 08:36:05PM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote: > > Hi Josh, > > > > FYI, the error/warning still remains. You may either fix it or ask me to silently ignore in future. > > As mentioned before, it's a bug in mn10300, not a bug in the commit in > question. It needs fixing by the mn10300 architecture folks. Please > send it to them in the future. > > My description of the bug from the previous time this came up: > > This looks like a bug in mn10300. This code is within an ifdef on > > CONFIG_GENERIC_BUG, and the declaration of the structure is within > > ifdefs on both CONFIG_GENERIC_BUG and CONFIG_BUG, but: > > > > > CONFIG_MN10300=y > > [...] > > > CONFIG_GENERIC_BUG=y > > [...] > > > # CONFIG_BUG is not set > > > > Other architectures, including x86 (arch/x86/Kconfig) and powerpc > > (arch/powerpc/Kconfig) have GENERIC_BUG depend on BUG. Looks like > > mn10300 doesn't. > > - Josh Triplett -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>