On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 09:19:29AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > >> So it would be the responsibility of the caller to fall back from > >> ioremap(..., CACHED) to ioremap(..., UNCACHED)? > >> I.e. all drivers using it should be changed... > > > > All of the zero users we currently have will need to be changed, yes. > > Good. Less work to convert all of these ;-) And I didn't have enough coffee yet. We of course have a few users of ioremap_cache(), and two implememantions but no users of ioremap_cached(). Looks like the implementations can't even agree on the name. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>