Re: [PATCH 1/3] memtest: use kstrtouint instead of simple_strtoul

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Vladimir Murzin
<vladimir.murzin@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 20/06/15 07:55, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Vladimir Murzin
>> <vladimir.murzin@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Since simple_strtoul is obsolete and memtest_pattern is type of int, use
>>> kstrtouint instead.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@xxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>  mm/memtest.c |   14 +++++++++-----
>>>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/mm/memtest.c b/mm/memtest.c
>>> index 1997d93..895a43c 100644
>>> --- a/mm/memtest.c
>>> +++ b/mm/memtest.c
>>> @@ -88,14 +88,18 @@ static void __init do_one_pass(u64 pattern, phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end)
>>>  }
>>>
>>>  /* default is disabled */
>>> -static int memtest_pattern __initdata;
>>> +static unsigned int memtest_pattern __initdata;
>>>
>>>  static int __init parse_memtest(char *arg)
>>>  {
>>> -       if (arg)
>>> -               memtest_pattern = simple_strtoul(arg, NULL, 0);
>>> -       else
>>> -               memtest_pattern = ARRAY_SIZE(patterns);
>>> +       if (arg) {
>>> +               int err = kstrtouint(arg, 0, &memtest_pattern);
>>> +
>>> +               if (!err)
>>> +                       return 0;
>> kstrtouint returns 0 for success, in case of error you will fallback
>> and execute following line. It is definetely change of behaviour.
>
> I'd be glad if you can elaborate more on use cases dependent on this
> change? I can only imagine providing garbage to the memtest option with
> only intention to shut it up... but it looks like the interface abuse
> since "memtest=0" does exactly the same.
>
> Since memtest is debugging option and numeric parameter is optional I
> thought it was not harmful to fallback to default in case something is
> wrong with the parameter.
I would like to suggest you, in case of error, print warning and set
memtest_pattern to be zero and return back to if(arg)..else
construction.

>
> Thanks
> Vladimir
>
>>> +       }
>>> +
>>> +       memtest_pattern = ARRAY_SIZE(patterns);
>>>
>>>         return 0;
>>>  }
>>> --
>>> 1.7.9.5
>>>
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
>>> the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
>>> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
>>> Don't email: <a hrefmailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
>>
>>
>>
>



-- 
Leon Romanovsky | Independent Linux Consultant
        www.leon.nu | leon@xxxxxxx

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]