Re: [PATCH 2/3] memtest: cleanup log messages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 20/06/15 07:59, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Vladimir Murzin
> <vladimir.murzin@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> - prefer pr_info(...  to printk(KERN_INFO ...
>> - use %pa for phys_addr_t
>> - use cpu_to_be64 while printing pattern in reserve_bad_mem()
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@xxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  mm/memtest.c |   14 +++++---------
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/memtest.c b/mm/memtest.c
>> index 895a43c..ccaed3e 100644
>> --- a/mm/memtest.c
>> +++ b/mm/memtest.c
>> @@ -31,10 +31,8 @@ static u64 patterns[] __initdata = {
>>
>>  static void __init reserve_bad_mem(u64 pattern, phys_addr_t start_bad, phys_addr_t end_bad)
>>  {
>> -       printk(KERN_INFO "  %016llx bad mem addr %010llx - %010llx reserved\n",
>> -              (unsigned long long) pattern,
>> -              (unsigned long long) start_bad,
>> -              (unsigned long long) end_bad);
>> +       pr_info("%016llx bad mem addr %pa - %pa reserved\n",
>> +               cpu_to_be64(pattern), &start_bad, &end_bad);
>>         memblock_reserve(start_bad, end_bad - start_bad);
>>  }
>>
>> @@ -78,10 +76,8 @@ static void __init do_one_pass(u64 pattern, phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end)
>>                 this_start = clamp(this_start, start, end);
>>                 this_end = clamp(this_end, start, end);
>>                 if (this_start < this_end) {
>> -                       printk(KERN_INFO "  %010llx - %010llx pattern %016llx\n",
>> -                              (unsigned long long)this_start,
>> -                              (unsigned long long)this_end,
>> -                              (unsigned long long)cpu_to_be64(pattern));
>> +                       pr_info("  %pa - %pa pattern %016llx\n",
> s/(" %pa/("%pa

I don't think so since these messages belong to the "early_memtest:" and
this whitespace highlights where these logs come from.

Thanks
Vladimir

>> +                               &this_start, &this_end, cpu_to_be64(pattern));
>>                         memtest(pattern, this_start, this_end - this_start);
>>                 }
>>         }
>> @@ -114,7 +110,7 @@ void __init early_memtest(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end)
>>         if (!memtest_pattern)
>>                 return;
>>
>> -       printk(KERN_INFO "early_memtest: # of tests: %d\n", memtest_pattern);
>> +       pr_info("early_memtest: # of tests: %u\n", memtest_pattern);
>>         for (i = memtest_pattern-1; i < UINT_MAX; --i) {
>>                 idx = i % ARRAY_SIZE(patterns);
>>                 do_one_pass(patterns[idx], start, end);
>> --
>> 1.7.9.5
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
>> the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
>> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
>> Don't email: <a hrefmailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
> 
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]