Re: [PATCH] mm: use srcu for shrinkers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2015-06-17 at 09:47 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On the other hand using srcu is a neat idea. Shrinkers only need the
> existence guarantee when racing with unregister. Register even shouldn't
> be that interesting because such a shrinker wouldn't have much to
> shrink anyway so we can safely miss it AFAIU. With the srcu read lock
> we can finally get rid of the try_lock. I do not think you need an
> ugly spin_is_locked as the replacement though. We have the existence
> guarantee and that should be sufficient.

So the reason for the spin_is_locked check was that I was concerned
about new reader(s) that come in while doing the registry. Currently
this is forbidden by the trylock and fake-ish retry. But yes, perhaps I
was being over safe and we shouldn't be blockling the reclaim simply
because a shrinker is registering. And it would be cleaner to get rid of
the whole retry idea and just use rcu guarantees.

This is probably a little late in the game to try to push for 4.2, so
I'll send a v2 with any other updates that might come up once the merge
window closes.

Thanks,
Davidlohr

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]