On Tue, 9 Jun 2015, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > mempool_destroy() does not tolerate a NULL mempool_t pointer > argument and performs a NULL-pointer dereference. This requires > additional attention and effort from developers/reviewers and > forces all mempool_destroy() callers to do a NULL check > > if (pool) > mempool_destroy(pool); > > Or, otherwise, be invalid mempool_destroy() users. > > Tweak mempool_destroy() and NULL-check the pointer there. > > Proposed by Andrew Morton. > > Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxx> > Reported-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > LKML-reference: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/6/8/583 Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx> I like how your patch series is enabling us to remove many lines from the source code. But doing s/Reported-by/Suggested-by/ can also make your changelog two lines shorter ;) -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>