On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 14:51:09 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 15 Jun 2015 17:52:26 +0200 Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > The current kmem_cache/SLAB bulking API need to release all objects > > in case the layer cannot satisfy the full request. > > > > If __kmem_cache_alloc_bulk() fails, all allocated objects in array > > should be freed, but, __kmem_cache_alloc_bulk() can't know > > about objects allocated by this slub specific kmem_cache_alloc_bulk() > > function. > > Can we fold patches 2, 3 and 4 into a single patch? > > And maybe patch 5 as well. I don't think we need all these > development-time increments in the permanent record. I agree. I'll fold them when submitting V2 -- Best regards, Jesper Dangaard Brouer MSc.CS, Sr. Network Kernel Developer at Red Hat Author of http://www.iptv-analyzer.org LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>