I didn't read v2 yet, but I'd like to ask a question. Why do we need vmalloc_sync_all()? It has a single caller, register_die_notifier() which calls it without any explanation. IMO, this needs a comment at least. I am not sure I understand the changelog in 101f12af correctly, but at first glance vmalloc_sync_all() is no longer needed at least on x86, do_page_fault() no longer does notify_die(DIE_PAGE_FAULT). And btw DIE_PAGE_FAULT has no users. DIE_MNI too... Perhaps we can simply kill it on x86? As for other architectures I am not sure. arch/tile implements vmalloc_sync_all() and uses notify_die() in do_page_fault(). And in any case register_die_notifier()->vmalloc_sync() looks strange. If (say) arch/tile needs this to fix the problem with modules, perhaps it should do vmalloc_sync_all() in do_init_module() paths? Oleg. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>