Re: [RFC] panic when reboot the system

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 15:17:23 +0800 Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! exitcode=0x00000007
> 
> Pid: 1, comm: init Tainted: G  R        O 3.4.24.19-0.11-default #1
> Call Trace:
>  [<ffffffff8144dd24>] panic+0xc1/0x1e2
>  [<ffffffff8104483b>] do_exit+0x7db/0x8d0
>  [<ffffffff81044c7a>] do_group_exit+0x3a/0xa0
>  [<ffffffff8105394b>] get_signal_to_deliver+0x1ab/0x5e0
>  [<ffffffff81002270>] do_signal+0x60/0x5f0
>  [<ffffffff8145bf97>] ? do_page_fault+0x4a7/0x4d0
>  [<ffffffff81170d2c>] ? poll_select_copy_remaining+0xec/0x140
>  [<ffffffff81002885>] do_notify_resume+0x65/0x80
>  [<ffffffff8124ca7e>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3c
>  [<ffffffff814587ab>] retint_signal+0x4d/0x92
> 
> 
> The system has a little memory left, then reboot it, and get the panic.
> Perhaps this is a bug and trigger it like this and the latest kernel maybe
> also have the problem.
> 
> use a lot of memory
>   wake up kswapd()
>     reclaim some pages from init thread (pid=1)
>       reboot
>         shutdown the disk
>           init thread read data from disk
>             page fault, because the page has already reclaimed
>               receive SIGBUS, and init thread exit
>                 trigger the panic
> 
> 

Interesting.  3.4 is a pretty old kernel but I expect at least some of
this remains.

- Why the heck did the disk get shut down while init still had pages
  on it?  We shouldn't be able to get that far without having done a
  swapoff.

- Ignoring the above, as far as I can tell a regular old I/O error
  during pagein of one of init's pages (anon or file-backed) will
  result in the delivery of SIGBUS to init.  If init isn't catching
  SIGBUS (or if init's signal-handling code is also swapped out to a
  bad sector??) then we're going to kill init and the system will panic
  as above.

  I'm not sure what we can do in this situation - init has
  permanently lost some text or data and is hence dead.  But panicing
  the system doesn't seem the correct response.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]