Re: [RFC PATCH] slub: RFC: Improving SLUB performance with 38% on NO-PREEMPT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 8 Jun 2015, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:

> My real question is if disabling local interrupts is enough to avoid this?

Yes the initial release of slub used interrupt disable in the fast paths.

> And, does local irq disabling also stop preemption?

Of course.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]