On 2015/6/5 0:57, Luck, Tony wrote:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_MIRROR
> +struct numa_mirror_info {
> + int node;
> + unsigned long start;
> + unsigned long size;
> +};
> +
> +struct mirror_info {
> + int count;
> + struct numa_mirror_info info[MAX_NUMNODES];
> +};
>
> Do we really need this? My patch series leaves all the mirrored memory in
> the memblock allocator tagged with the MEMBLOCK_MIRROR flag. Can't
> we use that information when freeing the boot memory into the runtime
> free lists?
>
Hi Tony,
I used this code for testing before, so when your patchset added to mainline,
I'll rewrite it, use MEMBLOCK_MIRROR, not mirror_info.
I find Andrew has added your patches to mm-tree, right?
Thanks,
Xishi Qiu
> If we can't ... then [MAX_NUMNODES] may not be enough. We may have
> more than one mirrored range on each node. Current h/w allows two ranges
> per node.
>
> -Tony
>
> .
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>