On Sun, 2015-05-31 at 11:48 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx> > > Now that we emulate a PAT table when PAT is disabled, there's no need > for those checks anymore as the PAT abstraction will handle those cases > too. > > Based on a conglomerate patch from Toshi Kani. > > Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx> I reviewed the 1/3-3/3 patchset in your "tip-mm-2" branch, which is different from this submitted patchset 1/4-4/4. So, my review-by applies to the 3 patches in the "tip-mm-2" branch. Reviewed-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@xxxxxx> Thanks, -Toshi -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>