On May 27, 2015, at 12:49 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: Hello, KOSAKI, > On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 12:01 PM, Jungseok Lee <jungseoklee85@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> A current implementation assumes thread_info address is always correctly >> calculated via virt_to_page. It restricts a different approach, such as >> thread_info allocation from vmalloc space. >> >> This patch, thus, introduces an independent function to calculate page >> address from thread_info one. >> >> Suggested-by: Sungjinn Chung <barami97@xxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Jungseok Lee <jungseoklee85@xxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> --- >> kernel/fork.c | 7 ++++++- >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > I haven't receive a path [2/2] and haven't review whole patches. But > this patch itself is OK to me. > Acked-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks! I didn't add you to Cc list since [PATCH 2/2] is architecture specific. According to the feedbacks, it is needed to figure out fundamental solutions: 1) reduce stack size and 2) focus on a generic anti-fragmentation logic. Please refer to https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/5/24/121 for [PATCH 2/2]. Best Regards Jungseok Lee -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href