On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 4:29 PM, David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Blind conversion to pr_debug will blow the code because it will be always >> compiled in. > > No, it won't. Sorry, you are right. > >> Additionally, It looks like the output of these macros can be viewed by ftrace >> mechanism. > > *blink* It can? I was under strong impression that "function" and "function_graph" tracers will give similar kenter/kleave information. Do I miss anything important, except the difference in output format? > >> Maybe we should delete them from mm/nommu.c as was pointed by Joe? > > Why? If ftrace is sufficient to get the debug information, there will no need to duplicate it. > > David -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>