NUMA balancing is meant to be disabled by default on UMA machines but
the check is using nr_node_ids (highest node) instead of num_online_nodes
(online nodes). The consequences are that a UMA machine with a node ID of 1
or higher will enable NUMA balancing. This will incur useless overhead due
to minor faults with the impact depending on the workload. These are the
impact on the stats when running a kernel build on a single node machine
whose node ID happened to be 1;
vanilla patched
NUMA base PTE updates 5113158 0
NUMA huge PMD updates 643 0
NUMA page range updates 5442374 0
NUMA hint faults 2109622 0
NUMA hint local faults 2109622 0
NUMA hint local percent 100 100
NUMA pages migrated 0 0
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx>
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> #v3.8+
---
mm/mempolicy.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
index ede26291d4aa..747743237d9f 100644
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -2518,7 +2518,7 @@ static void __init check_numabalancing_enable(void)
if (numabalancing_override)
set_numabalancing_state(numabalancing_override == 1);
- if (nr_node_ids > 1 && !numabalancing_override) {
+ if (num_online_nodes() > 1 && !numabalancing_override) {
pr_info("%s automatic NUMA balancing. "
"Configure with numa_balancing= or the "
"kernel.numa_balancing sysctl",
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>