On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Kyungmin Park <kmpark@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 12:25 AM, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hello, Kyungmin. >> >> On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 09:04:26AM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote: >>> > I need to think more about it but as an *optimization* we can add >>> > freezing() test before actually waking tasks up during resume, but can >>> > you please clarify what you're seeing? >>> >>> The mobile application has life cycle and one of them is 'suspend' >>> state. it's different from 'pause' or 'background'. >>> if there are some application and enter go 'suspend' state. all >>> behaviors are stopped and can't do anything. right it's suspended. but >>> after system suspend & resume, these application is thawed and >>> running. even though system know it's suspended. >>> >>> We made some test application, print out some message within infinite >>> loop. when it goes 'suspend' state. nothing is print out. but after >>> system suspend & resume, it prints out again. that's not desired >>> behavior. and want to address it. >>> >>> frozen user processes should be remained as frozen while system >>> suspend & resume. >> >> Yes, they should and I'm not sure why what you're saying is happening >> because freezing() test done from the frozen tasks themselves should >> keep them in the freezer. Which kernel version did you test? Can you >> please verify it against a recent kernel? > > The kernel 3.10 is not working as expected, but right the latest > kernel is working correctly. Please ignore it. test is wrong and it's not working, see Krzysztof Mail. > > I see I'll check what's different and which are modified. > > Thank you, > Kyungmin Park -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>