Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] decouple pagefault_disable() from preempt_disable()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 01:08:28PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Yes, but I'm wondering what I'm missing: is there any deep reason for 
> making pagefaults-disabled sections non-atomic?

This all comes from -rt, where we had significant latencies due to these
things.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]