On Thu, 7 May 2015 01:12:07 +0000 Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 07:14:27PM +0800, Xie XiuQi wrote: > > Hi Naoya, > > > > Could you help to review and applied this series if possible. > > Sorry for late response, I was offline for several days due to national > holidays. > > This patchset is good to me, but I'm not sure which path it should go through. > Ordinarily, memory-failure patches go to linux-mm, but patch 3 depends on > TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM patches, so this can go to linux-next directly, or go to > linux-mm with depending patches. > > Steven, Andrew, which way do you like? > The TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM() patch set went into the 4.1 merge window. It should be fine to base off of any of Linus's tags after or including 4.1-rc1. I need to start converting other trace events for 4.2. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>