On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 11:31:24 -0700 Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > No functional changes > > ... > > --- a/include/linux/memblock.h > +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h > @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ extern bool movable_node_enabled; > > phys_addr_t memblock_find_in_range_node(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align, > phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end, > - int nid); > + int nid, u32 flag); Sometimes this is called "flag", other times it is called "flags". Can we please be consistent? "flags" seems to be the way to go. Also, memblock_region.flags has type unsigned long, but you've used u32. ulong seems better. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>