On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 11:32:08AM -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
> > Ok, I'm confused. Shouldn't the inclusive:1 case be
> >
> > (start:mtrr_start) (mtrr_start:mtrr_end) (mtrr_end:end)
> >
> > ?
> >
> > If so, this function would need more changes...
>
> Yes, that's how it gets separated eventually. Since *repeat is set in
> this case, the code only needs to separate the first part at a time.
> The 2nd part gets separated in the next call with the *repeat.
Aah, right, the caller is supposed to adjust the interval limits on
subsequent calls. Please reflect this in the comment because:
* (start:mtrr_start) (mtrr_start:end)
is misleading for inclusive:1.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>