Re: [patch v2 for-4.0] mm, thp: really limit transparent hugepage allocation to local node

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx> writes:

> On 04/21/2015 09:31 AM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>> On 25.2.2015 22:24, David Rientjes wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> alloc_pages_preferred_node() variant, change the exact_node() variant to pass
>>>>> __GFP_THISNODE, and audit and adjust all callers accordingly.
>>>>>
....
...
>>> Right, we might be changing behavior not just for slab allocators, but
>>> also others using such
>>> combination of flags.
>>
>> Any update on this ? Did we reach a conclusion on how to go forward here
>> ?
>
> I believe David's later version was merged already. Or what exactly are 
> you asking about?

When I checked last time I didn't find it. Hence I asked here. Now I
see that it got committed as 5265047ac30191ea24b16503165000c225f54feb

Thanks
-aneesh

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]