Re: [PATCHv5 04/28] mm, thp: adjust conditions when we can reuse the page on WP fault

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:02:46AM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
> > 
> > With new refcounting we will be able map the same compound page with
> > PTEs and PMDs. It requires adjustment to conditions when we can reuse
> > the page on write-protection fault.
> > 
> > For PTE fault we can't reuse the page if it's part of huge page.
> > 
> > For PMD we can only reuse the page if nobody else maps the huge page or
> > it's part. We can do it by checking page_mapcount() on each sub-page,
> > but it's expensive.
> > 
> > The cheaper way is to check page_count() to be equal 1: every mapcount
> > takes page reference, so this way we can guarantee, that the PMD is the
> > only mapping.
> > 
> > This approach can give false negative if somebody pinned the page, but
> > that doesn't affect correctness.
> >
> Then we have to try more to allocate THP if pinned?
> Are we adding new cost?

Yes we do. But that shouldn't be often.

Alternatively, we could iterate over all sub-pages and check their
mapcount.

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]