Hello, Jan.
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 05:32:24PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > @@ -454,9 +451,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(bdi_init);
> >
> > void bdi_destroy(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
> > {
> > - bdi_wb_shutdown(bdi);
> > -
> > - WARN_ON(!list_empty(&bdi->work_list));
> > + /* make sure nobody finds us on the bdi_list anymore */
> > + bdi_remove_from_list(bdi);
> > + wb_shutdown(&bdi->wb);
> >
> > if (bdi->dev) {
> > bdi_debug_unregister(bdi);
> But if someone ends up calling bdi_destroy() on unregistered bdi,
> bdi_remove_from_list() will be corrupting memory, won't it? And if I
bdi_init() does INIT_LIST_HEAD() on it, so it should be fine, no?
> remember right there were some corner cases where this really happened.
> Previously we were careful and checked WB_registered. I guess we could
> check for !list_empty(&bdi->bdi_list) and also reinit bdi_list in
> bdi_remove_from_list() after synchronize_rcu_expedited().
But we can't call bdi_destroy() more than once no matter what. We'd
be doing double frees.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>