On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Konstantin Khlebnikov
<khlebnikov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Node 0 might be offline as well as any other numa node,
> in this case kernel cannot handle memory allocation and crashes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Fixes: 0c3f061c195c ("of: implement of_node_to_nid as a weak function")
> ---
> drivers/of/base.c | 2 +-
> include/linux/of.h | 5 ++++-
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
> index 8f165b112e03..51f4bd16e613 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/base.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/base.c
> @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_n_size_cells);
> #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> int __weak of_node_to_nid(struct device_node *np)
> {
> - return numa_node_id();
> + return NUMA_NO_NODE;
This is going to break any NUMA machine that enables OF and expects
the weak function to work.
Rob
> }
> #endif
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h
> index dfde07e77a63..78a04ee85a9c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/of.h
> +++ b/include/linux/of.h
> @@ -623,7 +623,10 @@ static inline const char *of_prop_next_string(struct property *prop,
> #if defined(CONFIG_OF) && defined(CONFIG_NUMA)
> extern int of_node_to_nid(struct device_node *np);
> #else
> -static inline int of_node_to_nid(struct device_node *device) { return 0; }
> +static inline int of_node_to_nid(struct device_node *device)
> +{
> + return NUMA_NO_NODE;
> +}
> #endif
>
> static inline struct device_node *of_find_matching_node(
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>