On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 06:11:35PM +0200, Gerald Schaefer wrote:
> commit 61f77eda "mm/hugetlb: reduce arch dependent code around follow_huge_*"
> broke follow_huge_pmd() on s390, where pmd and pte layout differ and using
> pte_page() on a huge pmd will return wrong results. Using pmd_page() instead
> fixes this.
>
> All architectures that were touched by commit 61f77eda have pmd_page()
> defined, so this should not break anything on other architectures.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thank you for the report. This looks good to me.
Acked-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # v3.12
> ---
> mm/hugetlb.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index e8c92ae..271e443 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -3865,8 +3865,7 @@ retry:
> if (!pmd_huge(*pmd))
> goto out;
> if (pmd_present(*pmd)) {
> - page = pte_page(*(pte_t *)pmd) +
> - ((address & ~PMD_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> + page = pmd_page(*pmd) + ((address & ~PMD_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> if (flags & FOLL_GET)
> get_page(page);
> } else {
> --
> 2.1.4
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href