On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 07:00:37PM +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > On 04/08/2015 06:56 PM, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > > From: Yigal Korman <yigal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > [For Stable 4.0.X] > > The parallel patch at 4.1-rc1 to this patch is: > > Subject: mm: new pfn_mkwrite same as page_mkwrite for VM_PFNMAP > > > > We need this patch for the 4.0.X stable tree if the patch > > Subject: dax: use pfn_mkwrite to update c/mtime + freeze protection > > > > Was decided to be pulled into stable since it is a dependency > > of this patch. The file mm/memory.c was heavily changed in 4.1 > > hence this here. > > > > I forgot to send this patch for the stables tree, 4.0 only. > > Again this one is only needed if we are truing to pull > Subject: dax: use pfn_mkwrite to update c/mtime + freeze protection > > Which has the Stable@ tag. The problem it fixes is minor and might > be skipped if causes problems. I can't take patches in the stable tree that are not in Linus's tree also. Why can't I just take a corrisponding patch that is already in Linus's tree, why do we need something "special" here? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>