On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 02:35:21PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Mar 2015 01:45:55 +0000 Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Currently when a process accesses to hugetlb range protected with PROTNONE,
> > unexpected COWs are triggered, which finally put hugetlb subsystem into
> > broken/uncontrollable state, where for example h->resv_huge_pages is subtracted
> > too much and wrapped around to a very large number, and free hugepage pool
> > is no longer maintainable.
> >
> > This patch simply stops changing protection for vma(VM_HUGETLB) to fix the
> > problem. And this also allows us to avoid useless overhead of minor faults.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > @@ -2161,8 +2161,10 @@ void task_numa_work(struct callback_head *work)
> > vma = mm->mmap;
> > }
> > for (; vma; vma = vma->vm_next) {
> > - if (!vma_migratable(vma) || !vma_policy_mof(vma))
> > + if (!vma_migratable(vma) || !vma_policy_mof(vma) ||
> > + is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma)) {
> > continue;
> > + }
> >
> > /*
> > * Shared library pages mapped by multiple processes are not
>
> Which kernel version(s) need this patch?
I don't bisect completely, but the problem this patch is mentioning is visible
since v4.0-rc1 (not reproduced at v3.19).
Thanks,
Naoya Horiguchi
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href