Hello Andrew,
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 02:20:10PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 14:35:02 +0900 Minchan Kim <minchan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > --- a/mm/swap.c
> > +++ b/mm/swap.c
> > @@ -866,6 +866,13 @@ void deactivate_file_page(struct page *page)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > +/**
> > + * deactivate_page - deactivate a page
> > + * @page: page to deactivate
> > + *
> > + * This function moves @page to inactive list if @page was on active list and
> > + * was not unevictable page to accelerate to reclaim @page.
> > + */
> > void deactivate_page(struct page *page)
> > {
> > if (PageLRU(page) && PageActive(page) && !PageUnevictable(page)) {
>
> Thanks.
>
> deactivate_page() doesn't look at or alter PageReferenced(). Should it?
Absolutely true. Thanks.
Here it goes.
>From 2b2c92eb73a1cceac615b9abd4c0f5f0c3395ff5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 13:38:46 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] mm: lru_deactivate_fn should clear PG_referenced
deactivate_page aims for accelerate for reclaiming through
moving pages from active list to inactive list so we should
clear PG_referenced for the goal.
Suggested-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/swap.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c
index b65fc8c..6b420022 100644
--- a/mm/swap.c
+++ b/mm/swap.c
@@ -800,6 +800,7 @@ static void lru_deactivate_fn(struct page *page, struct lruvec *lruvec,
del_page_from_lru_list(page, lruvec, lru + LRU_ACTIVE);
ClearPageActive(page);
+ ClearPageReferenced(page);
add_page_to_lru_list(page, lruvec, lru);
__count_vm_event(PGDEACTIVATE);
--
1.9.3
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>