On 30 March 2015 at 19:29, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Yeah, so that _should_ not trigger (obviously), and while I agree with
> the sentiment of sanity checks, I'm not sure its worth keeping that
> variable around just for that.
I read it as I can remove it then ? :)
> Anyway, while I'm looking at struct tvec_base I notice the cpu member
> should be second after the lock, that'll save 8 bytes on the structure
> on 64bit machines.
Hmm, I tried it on my macbook-pro.
$ uname -a
Linux vireshk 3.13.0-46-generic #79-Ubuntu SMP Tue Mar 10 20:06:50 UTC
2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
$ gcc --version
gcc (Ubuntu 4.8.2-19ubuntu1) 4.8.2
config: arch/x86/configs/x86_64_defconfig
And all I get it is 8256 bytes, with or without the change.
diff --git a/kernel/time/timer.c b/kernel/time/timer.c
index 2d3f5c504939..afc5d74678df 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timer.c
@@ -77,12 +77,12 @@ struct tvec_root {
struct tvec_base {
spinlock_t lock;
+ int cpu;
struct timer_list *running_timer;
unsigned long timer_jiffies;
unsigned long next_timer;
unsigned long active_timers;
unsigned long all_timers;
- int cpu;
struct tvec_root tv1;
struct tvec tv2;
struct tvec tv3;
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>