On 03/29/2015 11:02 AM, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > On 03/26/2015 09:32 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: <> > I think that ->direct_access should not be any different then > any other block-device access, ie allow to sleep. > BTW: Matthew you yourself have said that after a page-load of memcpy a user should call sched otherwise bad things will happen to the system you even commented so on one of my patches when you thought I was allowing a single memcpy bigger than a page. So if the user *must* call sched after a call to ->direct_access that is a "sleep" No? Thanks Boaz -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>