On (03/25/15 14:05), Heesub Shin wrote:
> No, it's not unnecessary. We should do kunmap_atomic() in the reverse
> order of kmap_atomic(), so unfortunately it's inevitable to
> kunmap_atomic() both on d_addr and s_addr.
>
Andrew, can you please drop this patch?
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > mm/zsmalloc.c | 2 --
> > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/zsmalloc.c b/mm/zsmalloc.c
> > index d920e8b..7af4456 100644
> > --- a/mm/zsmalloc.c
> > +++ b/mm/zsmalloc.c
> > @@ -1536,12 +1536,10 @@ static void zs_object_copy(unsigned long src, unsigned long dst,
> > break;
> >
> > if (s_off + size >= PAGE_SIZE) {
> > - kunmap_atomic(d_addr);
> > kunmap_atomic(s_addr);
>
> Removing kunmap_atomic(d_addr) here may cause BUG_ON() at __kunmap_atomic().
>
> I tried yours to see it really happens:
> > kernel BUG at arch/arm/mm/highmem.c:113!
oh, arm. tested on x86_64 only. I see why it happens there. thanks for reporting.
sorry, should have checked.
> > Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] SMP ARM
> > Modules linked in:
> > CPU: 2 PID: 1774 Comm: bash Not tainted 4.0.0-rc2-mm1+ #105
> > Hardware name: ARM-Versatile Express
> > task: ee971300 ti: e8a26000 task.ti: e8a26000
> > PC is at __kunmap_atomic+0x144/0x14c
> > LR is at zs_object_copy+0x19c/0x2dc
-ss
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>