> > In current patch I simply put newly allocated block to the tail of a free list, > thus reduce fragmentation, giving a chance to resolve allocation request using > older blocks with possible holes left. It's great. I think this might be helpful for fragmentation by mix of long-time, short-time mappings. I do thank you for your work. > > Signed-off-by: Roman Pen <r.peniaev@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@xxxxxxx> > Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: WANG Chao <chaowang@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Fabian Frederick <fabf@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@xxxxxxx> > Cc: Rob Jones <rob.jones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx > Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > --- > mm/vmalloc.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c > index 39c3388..db6bffb 100644 > --- a/mm/vmalloc.c > +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c > @@ -837,7 +837,7 @@ static struct vmap_block *new_vmap_block(gfp_t gfp_mask) > > vbq = &get_cpu_var(vmap_block_queue); > spin_lock(&vbq->lock); > - list_add_rcu(&vb->free_list, &vbq->free); > + list_add_tail_rcu(&vb->free_list, &vbq->free); > spin_unlock(&vbq->lock); > put_cpu_var(vmap_block_queue); > > -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>