On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 20:10 +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> "atomic_read(&mm->mm_users) <= 1" looks a bit more "safe". But again,
> I won't insist.
Agreed, it is nicer to do that check, but I have no strong preference
either, perhaps Konstantin or akpm do. Anyway, here's the change that
can be folded in if you guys want to.
Thanks.
8<-------------------------------------------------
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index 98858b5..0c3de2b 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -697,7 +697,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mmput);
void set_mm_exe_file(struct mm_struct *mm, struct file *new_exe_file)
{
struct file *old_exe_file = rcu_dereference_protected(mm->exe_file,
- !atomic_read(&mm->mm_users) || current->in_execve);
+ atomic_read(&mm->mm_users) <= 1);
if (new_exe_file)
get_file(new_exe_file);
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>