On 03/19/2015 02:57 PM, Eric B Munson wrote:
> Currently, pages which are marked as unevictable are protected from
> compaction, but not from other types of migration. The POSIX real time
> extension explicitly states that mlock() will prevent a major page
> fault, but the spirit of is is that mlock() should give a process the
> ability to control sources of latency, including minor page faults.
> However, the mlock manpage only explicitly says that a locked page will
> not be written to swap and this can cause some confusion. The
> compaction code today, does not give a developer who wants to avoid swap
> but wants to have large contiguous areas available any method to achieve
> this state. This patch introduces a sysctl for controlling compaction
> behavoir with respect to the unevictable lru. Users that demand no page
behavior
> faults after a page is present can set compact_unevictable to 0 and
compact_unevictable_allowed
> users who need the large contiguous areas can enable compaction on
> locked memory by leaving the default value of 1.
>
> To illustrate this problem I wrote a quick test program that mmaps a
> large number of 1MB files filled with random data. These maps are
> created locked and read only. Then every other mmap is unmapped and I
> attempt to allocate huge pages to the static huge page pool. When the
> compact_unevictable sysctl is 0, I cannot allocate hugepages after
compact_unevictable_allowed
> fragmenting memory. When the value is set to 1, allocations succeed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric B Munson <emunson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>