On Wed, 18 Mar 2015 22:08:26 -0700 Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxx> wrote: > > Daniel also had microbenchmark testing results for glibc and jemalloc. > > Can you please do this? > > I run Daniel's microbenchmark too, and not surprise the result is > similar: > glibc: 32.82 > jemalloc: 70.35 > jemalloc+mremap: 33.01 > tcmalloc: 68.81 > > but tcmalloc doesn't support mremap currently, so I cant test it. But Daniel's changelog implies strongly that tcmalloc would benefit from his patch. Was that inaccurate or is this a difference between his patch and yours? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>