On Wed, 18 Mar 2015 18:51:22 -0700 Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Nowhere here is the reader told the units of "size". We should at > > least describe that, and maybe even rename the thing to min_bytes. > > > > Ok, I will add that the size is in unit of bytes. My choice of > 'min_size' as a name for the new mount option was influenced by > the existing 'size' mount option. I'm open to any suggestions > for the name of this new mount option. Yes, due to the preexisting "size" I think we're stuck with "min_size". We could use min_size_bytes I guess, but the operator needs to go look up the units of "size" anyway. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>