Re: [PATCH V2 4/4] hugetlbfs: document min_size mount option

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 18 Mar 2015 18:51:22 -0700 Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > Nowhere here is the reader told the units of "size".  We should at
> > least describe that, and maybe even rename the thing to min_bytes.
> >
> 
> Ok, I will add that the size is in unit of bytes.  My choice of
> 'min_size' as a name for the new mount option was influenced by
> the existing 'size' mount option.  I'm open to any suggestions
> for the name of this new mount option.

Yes, due to the preexisting "size" I think we're stuck with "min_size".
We could use min_size_bytes I guess, but the operator needs to go look
up the units of "size" anyway.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]