Re: [PATCH 3/3] mtrr, mm, x86: Enhance MTRR checks for KVA huge page mapping

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 11:03 +0000, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@xxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > > Did it perhaps want to be the other way around:
> > > 
> > >         if (mtrr_state.have_fixed && (start < 0x1000000)) {
> > > 	...
> > >                 } else if (start < 0x100000) {
> > > 	...
> > > 
> > > or did it simply mess up the condition?
> > 
> > I think it was just paranoid to test the same condition twice...
> 
> Read the code again, it's _not_ the same condition ...

Oh, I see...  It must be a typo.  The fixed range is 0x0 to 0xFFFFF, so
it only makes sense to check with (start < 0x100000).

Thanks,
-Toshi

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]