On 03/09/2015 05:19 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > per-pidns like this is no good. You shouldn't be able to create a > non-paranoid pidns if your parent is paranoid. That sounds like a reasonable addition that shouldn't be hard to add. > Also, at some point we need actual per-ns controls. This mount option > stuff is hideous. So, per-pidns == bad per-ns == good If the pid namespace is the wrong place, which namespace is the right place? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>