Re: [RFC] slub memory quarantine

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 3 Mar 2015, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:

> On 03/03/2015 12:10 PM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> > Please hold on with this.
> > Dmitry Chernenkov is working on a quarantine that works with both slub
> > and slab, does not cause spurious OOMs and does not depend on
> > slub-debug which has unacceptable performance (acquires global lock).
>
> I think that it's a separate issue. KASan already depend on slub_debug - it required for redzones/user tracking.
> I think that some parts slub debugging (like user tracking and this quarantine)
> could be moved (for CONFIG_KASAN=y) to the fast path without any locking.

In general these features need to be ifdeffed out since they add
significant overhead for the data structures and execution paths.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]