On 2/27/2015 1:24 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 24 Feb 2015 15:39:45 -0800 Danesh Petigara <dpetigara@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> The CMA aligned offset calculation is incorrect for >> non-zero order_per_bit values. >> >> For example, if cma->order_per_bit=1, cma->base_pfn= >> 0x2f800000 and align_order=12, the function returns >> a value of 0x17c00 instead of 0x400. >> >> This patch fixes the CMA aligned offset calculation. > > When fixing a bug please always describe the end-user visible effects > of that bug. > > Without that information others are unable to understand why you are > recommending a -stable backport. > Thank you for the feedback. I had no crash logs to show, nevertheless, I agree that a sentence describing potential effects of the bug would've helped. I'll keep that in mind for future submissions. Best Regards, Danesh -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>