On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 08:22 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > +int set_pages_array_wt(struct page **pages, int addrinarray)
> > +{
> > + return _set_pages_array(pages, addrinarray, _PAGE_CACHE_MODE_WT);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(set_pages_array_wt);
>
> So by default we make new APIs EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(): we
> don't want proprietary modules mucking around with new code
> PAT interfaces, we only want modules we can analyze and fix
> in detail.
Right. I have one question for this case. This set_pages_array_wt()
extends the set_pages_array_xx() family, which are all exported with
EXPORT_SYMBOL() today. In this case, should we keep them exported in
the consistent manner, or should we still use GPL when adding a new one?
Thanks,
-Toshi
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>