> -----Original Message----- > From: penberg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:penberg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of > Pekka Enberg > Sent: 04 February 2015 20:42 > To: Daniel Sanders > Cc: Christoph Lameter; David Rientjes; Joonsoo Kim; Andrew Morton; linux- > mm@xxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] LLVMLinux: Correct size_index table before > replacing the bootstrap kmem_cache_node. > > On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:38 PM, Daniel Sanders > <Daniel.Sanders@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I don't believe the bug to be LLVM specific but GCC doesn't normally > encounter the problem. I haven't been able to identify exactly what GCC is > doing better (probably inlining) but it seems that GCC is managing to > optimize to the point that it eliminates the problematic allocations. This > theory is supported by the fact that GCC can be made to fail in the same way > by changing inline, __inline, __inline__, and __always_inline in > include/linux/compiler-gcc.h such that they don't actually inline things. > > OK, makes sense. Please include that explanation in the changelog and > drop use proper "slab" prefix instead of the confusing "LLVMLinux" > prefix in the subject line. > > - Pekka Sure. I've just updated the patch with those changes. ��.n������g��� �a��� �&ޖ)���)��h���&������梷���� �Ǟ�m������)������^�����������v���O��zf������