On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 04:06:03PM +0300, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> I noticed, that "allowed" can easily overflow by falling below 0,
> because (total_vm / 32) can be larger than "allowed". The problem
> occurs in OVERCOMMIT_NONE mode.
>
> In this case, a huge allocation can success and overcommit the system
> (despite OVERCOMMIT_NONE mode). All subsequent allocations will fall
> (system-wide), so system become unusable.
>
> The problem was masked out by commit c9b1d0981fcc
> ("mm: limit growth of 3% hardcoded other user reserve"),
> but it's easy to reproduce it on older kernels:
> 1) set overcommit_memory sysctl to 2
> 2) mmap() large file multiple times (with VM_SHARED flag)
> 3) try to malloc() large amount of memory
>
> It also can be reproduced on newer kernels, but miss-configured
> sysctl_user_reserve_kbytes is required.
>
> Fix this issue by switching to signed arithmetic here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <klamm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Andrew Shewmaker <agshew@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ---
> mm/mmap.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
> index 7f684d5..5aa8dfe 100644
> --- a/mm/mmap.c
> +++ b/mm/mmap.c
> @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vm_memory_committed);
> */
> int __vm_enough_memory(struct mm_struct *mm, long pages, int cap_sys_admin)
> {
> - unsigned long free, allowed, reserve;
> + long free, allowed, reserve;
>
> VM_WARN_ONCE(percpu_counter_read(&vm_committed_as) <
> -(s64)vm_committed_as_batch * num_online_cpus(),
> @@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ int __vm_enough_memory(struct mm_struct *mm, long pages, int cap_sys_admin)
> */
> if (mm) {
> reserve = sysctl_user_reserve_kbytes >> (PAGE_SHIFT - 10);
> - allowed -= min(mm->total_vm / 32, reserve);
> + allowed -= min((long)mm->total_vm / 32, reserve);
> }
>
> if (percpu_counter_read_positive(&vm_committed_as) < allowed)
> --
> 2.1.0
>
Makes sense to me. Please fix mm/nommu.c also.
If a caller passes in a big negative value for pages,
then vm_acct_memory() would decrement vm_committed_as, possibly
causing percpu_counter_read_positive(&vm_committed_as) and
__vm_enough_memory to return 0. Maybe that's okay? Callers
won't be passing in a negative pages anyway. Is there a reason
to let them, though?
-Andrew
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>