Re: [PATCH -mm v2 1/3] slub: never fail to shrink cache

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 29 Jan 2015, Vladimir Davydov wrote:

> Come to think of it, do we really need to optimize slab placement in
> kmem_cache_shrink? None of its users except shrink_store expects it -
> they just want to purge the cache before destruction, that's it. May be,
> we'd better move slab placement optimization to a separate SLUB's
> private function that would be called only by shrink_store, where we can
> put up with kmalloc failures? Christoph, what do you think?

The slabinfo tool invokes kmem_cache_shrink to optimize placement.

Run

	slabinfo -s

which can then be used to reduce the fragmentation.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]