Hello
在 2015/1/25 17:25, Vlastimil Babka 写道:
> On 23.1.2015 20:18, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>>> >+ if (!pte_write(pteval)) {
>>> >+ if (++ro > khugepaged_max_ptes_none)
>>> >+ goto out_unmap;
>>> >+ }
>> It's true this is maxed out at 511, so there must be at least one
>> writable and not none pte (as results of the two "ro" and "none"
>> counters checks).
>
> Hm, but if we consider ro and pte_none separately, both can be lower
> than 512, but the sum of the two can be 512, so we can actually be in
> read-only VMA?
Yes, I also think so.
So is it necessary to add a at-least-one-writable-pte check just like the existing
at-least-one-page-referenced check?
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>