On Fri, 23 Jan 2015, Johannes Weiner wrote: > struct mem_cgroup_tree_per_node *rtpn; > struct mem_cgroup_tree_per_zone *rtpz; > - int tmp, node, zone; > + int node, zone; > > for_each_node(node) { Do for_each_online_node(node) { instead? > - tmp = node; > - if (!node_state(node, N_NORMAL_MEMORY)) > - tmp = -1; > - rtpn = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*rtpn), GFP_KERNEL, tmp); > + rtpn = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*rtpn), GFP_KERNEL, node); > BUG_ON(!rtpn); > > soft_limit_tree.rb_tree_per_node[node] = rtpn; > > -- > > Is the assumption of this patch wrong? Does the specified node have > to be online for the fallback to work? > > Thanks > -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx"> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>