On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 09:25:38AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Right now we cannot serialise mmap against truncate or hole punch
> sanely. ->page_mkwrite is not able to take locks that the read IO
> path normally takes (i.e. the inode iolock) because that could
> result in lock inversions (read - iolock - page fault - page_mkwrite
> - iolock) and so we cannot use an IO path lock to serialise page
> write faults against truncate operations.
>
> Instead, introduce a new lock that is used *only* in the
> ->page_mkwrite path that is the equivalent of the iolock. The lock
> ordering in a page fault is i_mmaplock -> page lock -> i_ilock,
> and so in truncate we can i_iolock -> i_mmaplock and so lock out
> new write faults during the process of truncation.
>
> Because i_mmap_lock is outside the page lock, we can hold it across
> all the same operations we hold the i_iolock for. The only
> difference is that we never hold the i_mmaplock in the normal IO
> path and so do not ever have the possibility that we can page fault
> inside it. Hence there are no recursion issues on the i_mmap_lock
> and so we can use it to serialise page fault IO against inode
> modification operations that affect the IO path.
>
> This patch introduces the i_mmaplock infrastructure, lockdep
> annotations and initialisation/destruction code. Use of the new lock
> will be in subsequent patches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h | 29 +++++++++++++-----
> fs/xfs/xfs_super.c | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> index 400791a..573b49c 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> @@ -150,6 +150,8 @@ xfs_ilock(
> */
> ASSERT((lock_flags & (XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED | XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL)) !=
> (XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED | XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL));
> + ASSERT((lock_flags & (XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED | XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)) !=
> + (XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED | XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL));
The comment that precedes xfs_ilock() explains the locks that exist
within the inode, locking order, etc. We should probably update it to
explain how i_mmap_lock fits in as well (e.g., text from the commit log
description would suffice, imo).
> ASSERT((lock_flags & (XFS_ILOCK_SHARED | XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)) !=
> (XFS_ILOCK_SHARED | XFS_ILOCK_EXCL));
> ASSERT((lock_flags & ~(XFS_LOCK_MASK | XFS_LOCK_DEP_MASK)) == 0);
> @@ -159,6 +161,11 @@ xfs_ilock(
> else if (lock_flags & XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED)
> mraccess_nested(&ip->i_iolock, XFS_IOLOCK_DEP(lock_flags));
>
> + if (lock_flags & XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)
> + mrupdate_nested(&ip->i_mmaplock, XFS_IOLOCK_DEP(lock_flags));
> + else if (lock_flags & XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED)
> + mraccess_nested(&ip->i_mmaplock, XFS_IOLOCK_DEP(lock_flags));
> +
XFS_MMAPLOCK_DEP()?
> if (lock_flags & XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)
> mrupdate_nested(&ip->i_lock, XFS_ILOCK_DEP(lock_flags));
> else if (lock_flags & XFS_ILOCK_SHARED)
> @@ -191,6 +198,8 @@ xfs_ilock_nowait(
> */
> ASSERT((lock_flags & (XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED | XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL)) !=
> (XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED | XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL));
> + ASSERT((lock_flags & (XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED | XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)) !=
> + (XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED | XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL));
> ASSERT((lock_flags & (XFS_ILOCK_SHARED | XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)) !=
> (XFS_ILOCK_SHARED | XFS_ILOCK_EXCL));
> ASSERT((lock_flags & ~(XFS_LOCK_MASK | XFS_LOCK_DEP_MASK)) == 0);
> @@ -202,21 +211,35 @@ xfs_ilock_nowait(
> if (!mrtryaccess(&ip->i_iolock))
> goto out;
> }
> +
> + if (lock_flags & XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL) {
> + if (!mrtryupdate(&ip->i_mmaplock))
> + goto out_undo_iolock;
> + } else if (lock_flags & XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED) {
> + if (!mrtryaccess(&ip->i_mmaplock))
> + goto out_undo_iolock;
> + }
> +
> if (lock_flags & XFS_ILOCK_EXCL) {
> if (!mrtryupdate(&ip->i_lock))
> - goto out_undo_iolock;
> + goto out_undo_mmaplock;
> } else if (lock_flags & XFS_ILOCK_SHARED) {
> if (!mrtryaccess(&ip->i_lock))
> - goto out_undo_iolock;
> + goto out_undo_mmaplock;
> }
> return 1;
>
> - out_undo_iolock:
> +out_undo_mmaplock:
> + if (lock_flags & XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)
> + mrunlock_excl(&ip->i_mmaplock);
> + else if (lock_flags & XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED)
> + mrunlock_shared(&ip->i_mmaplock);
> +out_undo_iolock:
> if (lock_flags & XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL)
> mrunlock_excl(&ip->i_iolock);
> else if (lock_flags & XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED)
> mrunlock_shared(&ip->i_iolock);
> - out:
> +out:
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -244,6 +267,8 @@ xfs_iunlock(
> */
> ASSERT((lock_flags & (XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED | XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL)) !=
> (XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED | XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL));
> + ASSERT((lock_flags & (XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED | XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)) !=
> + (XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED | XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL));
> ASSERT((lock_flags & (XFS_ILOCK_SHARED | XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)) !=
> (XFS_ILOCK_SHARED | XFS_ILOCK_EXCL));
> ASSERT((lock_flags & ~(XFS_LOCK_MASK | XFS_LOCK_DEP_MASK)) == 0);
> @@ -254,6 +279,11 @@ xfs_iunlock(
> else if (lock_flags & XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED)
> mrunlock_shared(&ip->i_iolock);
>
> + if (lock_flags & XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)
> + mrunlock_excl(&ip->i_mmaplock);
> + else if (lock_flags & XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED)
> + mrunlock_shared(&ip->i_mmaplock);
> +
> if (lock_flags & XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)
> mrunlock_excl(&ip->i_lock);
> else if (lock_flags & XFS_ILOCK_SHARED)
> @@ -271,11 +301,14 @@ xfs_ilock_demote(
> xfs_inode_t *ip,
> uint lock_flags)
> {
> - ASSERT(lock_flags & (XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL|XFS_ILOCK_EXCL));
> - ASSERT((lock_flags & ~(XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL|XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)) == 0);
> + ASSERT(lock_flags & (XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL|XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL|XFS_ILOCK_EXCL));
> + ASSERT((lock_flags &
> + ~(XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL|XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL|XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)) == 0);
>
> if (lock_flags & XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)
> mrdemote(&ip->i_lock);
> + if (lock_flags & XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)
> + mrdemote(&ip->i_mmaplock);
> if (lock_flags & XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL)
> mrdemote(&ip->i_iolock);
>
> @@ -294,6 +327,12 @@ xfs_isilocked(
> return rwsem_is_locked(&ip->i_lock.mr_lock);
> }
>
> + if (lock_flags & (XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL|XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED)) {
> + if (!(lock_flags & XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED))
> + return !!ip->i_mmaplock.mr_writer;
> + return rwsem_is_locked(&ip->i_mmaplock.mr_lock);
> + }
> +
> if (lock_flags & (XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL|XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED)) {
> if (!(lock_flags & XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED))
> return !!ip->i_iolock.mr_writer;
> @@ -314,14 +353,27 @@ int xfs_lock_delays;
> #endif
>
> /*
> - * Bump the subclass so xfs_lock_inodes() acquires each lock with
> - * a different value
> + * Bump the subclass so xfs_lock_inodes() acquires each lock with a different
> + * value. This shouldn't be called for page fault locking, but we also need to
> + * ensure we don't overrun the number of lockdep subclasses for the iolock or
> + * mmaplock as that is limited to 12 by the mmap lock lockdep annotations.
> */
> static inline int
> xfs_lock_inumorder(int lock_mode, int subclass)
> {
> - if (lock_mode & (XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED|XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL))
> + if (lock_mode & (XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED|XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL)) {
> + ASSERT(subclass + XFS_LOCK_INUMORDER <
> + (1 << (XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHIFT - XFS_IOLOCK_SHIFT)));
> lock_mode |= (subclass + XFS_LOCK_INUMORDER) << XFS_IOLOCK_SHIFT;
> + }
> +
> + if (lock_mode & (XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED|XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)) {
> + ASSERT(subclass + XFS_LOCK_INUMORDER <
> + (1 << (XFS_ILOCK_SHIFT - XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHIFT)));
> + lock_mode |= (subclass + XFS_LOCK_INUMORDER) <<
> + XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHIFT;
> + }
> +
> if (lock_mode & (XFS_ILOCK_SHARED|XFS_ILOCK_EXCL))
> lock_mode |= (subclass + XFS_LOCK_INUMORDER) << XFS_ILOCK_SHIFT;
>
> @@ -440,10 +492,10 @@ again:
> }
>
> /*
> - * xfs_lock_two_inodes() can only be used to lock one type of lock
> - * at a time - the iolock or the ilock, but not both at once. If
> - * we lock both at once, lockdep will report false positives saying
> - * we have violated locking orders.
> + * xfs_lock_two_inodes() can only be used to lock one type of lock at a time -
> + * the iolock, the mmaplock or the ilock, but not more than one at a time. If we
> + * lock more than one at a time, lockdep will report false positives saying we
> + * have violated locking orders.
> */
> void
> xfs_lock_two_inodes(
> @@ -455,8 +507,12 @@ xfs_lock_two_inodes(
> int attempts = 0;
> xfs_log_item_t *lp;
>
> - if (lock_mode & (XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED|XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL))
> - ASSERT((lock_mode & (XFS_ILOCK_SHARED|XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)) == 0);
> + if (lock_mode & (XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED|XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL)) {
> + ASSERT(!(lock_mode & (XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED|XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)));
> + ASSERT(!(lock_mode & (XFS_ILOCK_SHARED|XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)));
> + } else if (lock_mode & (XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED|XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL))
> + ASSERT(!(lock_mode & (XFS_ILOCK_SHARED|XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)));
> +
Should this last branch not also check for iolock flags? If not, how is
that consistent with the function comment above?
Brian
> ASSERT(ip0->i_ino != ip1->i_ino);
>
> if (ip0->i_ino > ip1->i_ino) {
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
> index de97ccc..8e7a12a 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
> @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ typedef struct xfs_inode {
> struct xfs_inode_log_item *i_itemp; /* logging information */
> mrlock_t i_lock; /* inode lock */
> mrlock_t i_iolock; /* inode IO lock */
> + mrlock_t i_mmaplock; /* inode mmap IO lock */
> atomic_t i_pincount; /* inode pin count */
> spinlock_t i_flags_lock; /* inode i_flags lock */
> /* Miscellaneous state. */
> @@ -263,15 +264,20 @@ static inline int xfs_isiflocked(struct xfs_inode *ip)
> #define XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED (1<<1)
> #define XFS_ILOCK_EXCL (1<<2)
> #define XFS_ILOCK_SHARED (1<<3)
> +#define XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL (1<<4)
> +#define XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED (1<<5)
>
> #define XFS_LOCK_MASK (XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL | XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED \
> - | XFS_ILOCK_EXCL | XFS_ILOCK_SHARED)
> + | XFS_ILOCK_EXCL | XFS_ILOCK_SHARED \
> + | XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL | XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED)
>
> #define XFS_LOCK_FLAGS \
> { XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL, "IOLOCK_EXCL" }, \
> { XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED, "IOLOCK_SHARED" }, \
> { XFS_ILOCK_EXCL, "ILOCK_EXCL" }, \
> - { XFS_ILOCK_SHARED, "ILOCK_SHARED" }
> + { XFS_ILOCK_SHARED, "ILOCK_SHARED" }, \
> + { XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL, "MMAPLOCK_EXCL" }, \
> + { XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED, "MMAPLOCK_SHARED" }
>
>
> /*
> @@ -302,17 +308,26 @@ static inline int xfs_isiflocked(struct xfs_inode *ip)
> #define XFS_IOLOCK_SHIFT 16
> #define XFS_IOLOCK_PARENT (XFS_LOCK_PARENT << XFS_IOLOCK_SHIFT)
>
> +#define XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHIFT 20
> +
> #define XFS_ILOCK_SHIFT 24
> #define XFS_ILOCK_PARENT (XFS_LOCK_PARENT << XFS_ILOCK_SHIFT)
> #define XFS_ILOCK_RTBITMAP (XFS_LOCK_RTBITMAP << XFS_ILOCK_SHIFT)
> #define XFS_ILOCK_RTSUM (XFS_LOCK_RTSUM << XFS_ILOCK_SHIFT)
>
> -#define XFS_IOLOCK_DEP_MASK 0x00ff0000
> +#define XFS_IOLOCK_DEP_MASK 0x000f0000
> +#define XFS_MMAPLOCK_DEP_MASK 0x00f00000
> #define XFS_ILOCK_DEP_MASK 0xff000000
> -#define XFS_LOCK_DEP_MASK (XFS_IOLOCK_DEP_MASK | XFS_ILOCK_DEP_MASK)
> -
> -#define XFS_IOLOCK_DEP(flags) (((flags) & XFS_IOLOCK_DEP_MASK) >> XFS_IOLOCK_SHIFT)
> -#define XFS_ILOCK_DEP(flags) (((flags) & XFS_ILOCK_DEP_MASK) >> XFS_ILOCK_SHIFT)
> +#define XFS_LOCK_DEP_MASK (XFS_IOLOCK_DEP_MASK | \
> + XFS_MMAPLOCK_DEP_MASK | \
> + XFS_ILOCK_DEP_MASK)
> +
> +#define XFS_IOLOCK_DEP(flags) (((flags) & XFS_IOLOCK_DEP_MASK) \
> + >> XFS_IOLOCK_SHIFT)
> +#define XFS_MMAPLOCK_DEP(flags) (((flags) & XFS_MMAPLOCK_DEP_MASK) \
> + >> XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHIFT)
> +#define XFS_ILOCK_DEP(flags) (((flags) & XFS_ILOCK_DEP_MASK) \
> + >> XFS_ILOCK_SHIFT)
>
> /*
> * For multiple groups support: if S_ISGID bit is set in the parent
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> index afd6bae..40d2ac5 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> @@ -986,6 +986,8 @@ xfs_fs_inode_init_once(
> atomic_set(&ip->i_pincount, 0);
> spin_lock_init(&ip->i_flags_lock);
>
> + mrlock_init(&ip->i_mmaplock, MRLOCK_ALLOW_EQUAL_PRI|MRLOCK_BARRIER,
> + "xfsino", ip->i_ino);
> mrlock_init(&ip->i_lock, MRLOCK_ALLOW_EQUAL_PRI|MRLOCK_BARRIER,
> "xfsino", ip->i_ino);
> }
> --
> 2.0.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>