Re: [PATCH 3/6] memcg: track shared inodes with dirty pages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 11:04:49PM +0400, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> I know. Absolutely accurate per-page solution looks too complicated for me.
> Is there any real demand for accurate handling dirty set in shared inodes?
> Doing whole accounting in per-inode basis makes life so much easier.

Ah, yeah, patch #3 arrived in isolation, so I thought it was part of
something completely different.  I definitely thought about doing it
per-inode too (and also requiring memcg to attribute pages according
to its inode rather than individual pages).  I'll look into the
patchset and try to identify the pros and cons of our approaches.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]