On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 04:33:58PM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > > > It looks like this doesn't matter. The statistics here prints the size > > of summary memory occupied for pte_t entries, here PTRS_PER_PTE * sizeof(pte_t) > > is only valid for, once we start accounting pmd into same counter it implies > > that PTRS_PER_PTE == PTRS_PER_PMD, which is not true for all archs > > (if I understand the idea of accounting here right). > > Yeah. good catch. Thank you. > > I'll respin with separate counter for pmd tables. It seems the best > option. Sounds good to me, thanks. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>